Wisconsin Public Radio's To the Best of Our Knowledge had an hour devoted to ghost stories recently.
One of the sections was on people who think of someone dying at another place and they are proven right. What too many people don't consider is all the people who thought of someone dying and no such thing had happened.
I woke up one night certain that a friend had died. This was almost two decades ago and he is still alive.
Too often people are incredulous about some "miracle" but completely ignore all the times the "miracles" didn't happen under similar circumstances.
One of the anecdotes I read long ago was a picture of a shipwreck where survivors were huddled on shore. Supposedly these survivors had prayed they would reach safety. The cynic asked about all those who prayed to reach safety but drowned.
Showing posts with label To the Best of Our Knowledge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label To the Best of Our Knowledge. Show all posts
Monday, November 18, 2013
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Change of routine leads to paranoia
When we go to our cabin, we usually make a couple of stops before we leave Duluth. At the last of these, I plug in my iPhone for a podcast of Wisconsin Public Radio's "To the Best of Our Knowledge". The podcast lasts about 52 minutes, a bit less than the time it takes us to get our cabin.
Yesterday we planned to go to our cabin with no special stops. Instead of listening to Minnesota Public Radio until we made our stops, I plugged in my iPhone before I even backed out of the garage.
About ten miles away, I wondered if I had shut the garage door. My wife said I probably did. After all, whichever of us is the passenger almost always checks that the driver closed the door.
I didn't turn around, but it kept gnawing at me all the time we were at our cabin. I had visions of our lawnmower and snowblower being stolen. I wondered if my wife's car would be broken into. Around and around rattled these thoughts in my mind.
When we returned today, I forewent a couple of stops that I wanted to make and we came directly home.
Whew! The garage door was closed. As it opened I saw that my wife's car, the lawnmower, and the snowblower were all there.
A couple of hours later I'm still feeling the sense of relief!
Moral? Don't be distracted as you pack and definitely don't be distracted as you lock up. Have your paranoia about doing all you should before you leave, not after you are on your way:)
Yesterday we planned to go to our cabin with no special stops. Instead of listening to Minnesota Public Radio until we made our stops, I plugged in my iPhone before I even backed out of the garage.
About ten miles away, I wondered if I had shut the garage door. My wife said I probably did. After all, whichever of us is the passenger almost always checks that the driver closed the door.
I didn't turn around, but it kept gnawing at me all the time we were at our cabin. I had visions of our lawnmower and snowblower being stolen. I wondered if my wife's car would be broken into. Around and around rattled these thoughts in my mind.
When we returned today, I forewent a couple of stops that I wanted to make and we came directly home.
Whew! The garage door was closed. As it opened I saw that my wife's car, the lawnmower, and the snowblower were all there.
A couple of hours later I'm still feeling the sense of relief!
Moral? Don't be distracted as you pack and definitely don't be distracted as you lock up. Have your paranoia about doing all you should before you leave, not after you are on your way:)
Monday, September 10, 2012
Corporate Whimsy
Facebook, that time gobbler that so many can't do without and so many hate, is at it again changing the way it works.
Yesterday I posted a picture on Flickr and then wrote a note on Facebook with a link to the picture. When I clicked return, the picture was showing on my message list. A few friends commented on it and I saw the picture above their comments.
Today as I scrolled through my list of messages, the picture was gone but the text remained. I left a comment about it, and one friend said she hadn't seen it before and now she did.
One of the first rules of good human interface is consistency. If I do a certain thing in a certain set of circumstances, I should be able to get a similar result each and every time.
Facebook is not alone in inconsistent user interfaces. Microsoft, Apple, and many others confuse users time after time.
Through iTunes I download Wisconsin Public Radio's "To the Best of Our Knowledge" podcasts, receiving two each week. Suddenly, about four weeks ago I was getting only one. Last week I got none. This week I got one. With a little email help from the TTBOOK host, Jim Fleming, I figured out that iTunes or somebody has decided that I don't need podcasts that I've already downloaded, even if they were from two or more years ago. TTBOOK does rebroadcast programs and thus republishes the podcasts. But shouldn't I be the one to decide that I don't want to listen to an old program again?
Microsoft Office 2004 for the Mac had programmable macros with an extensive, easily used description for each available function. Microsoft decided to take macros out in Office 2008. They said users should write AppleScripts instead. I'll just say that AppleScript is a byzantine programming language. Microsoft decided to put macros back in Office 2011, but many old macros don't work or only work erratically. And the descriptions of the functions are often incomplete.
I'm sure many readers have their own tales of frustration about how software, computers, cars, and customer service departments work. So many of what we depend on may be produced efficiently, but do we get effective results using them?
Yesterday I posted a picture on Flickr and then wrote a note on Facebook with a link to the picture. When I clicked return, the picture was showing on my message list. A few friends commented on it and I saw the picture above their comments.
Today as I scrolled through my list of messages, the picture was gone but the text remained. I left a comment about it, and one friend said she hadn't seen it before and now she did.
One of the first rules of good human interface is consistency. If I do a certain thing in a certain set of circumstances, I should be able to get a similar result each and every time.
Facebook is not alone in inconsistent user interfaces. Microsoft, Apple, and many others confuse users time after time.
Through iTunes I download Wisconsin Public Radio's "To the Best of Our Knowledge" podcasts, receiving two each week. Suddenly, about four weeks ago I was getting only one. Last week I got none. This week I got one. With a little email help from the TTBOOK host, Jim Fleming, I figured out that iTunes or somebody has decided that I don't need podcasts that I've already downloaded, even if they were from two or more years ago. TTBOOK does rebroadcast programs and thus republishes the podcasts. But shouldn't I be the one to decide that I don't want to listen to an old program again?
Microsoft Office 2004 for the Mac had programmable macros with an extensive, easily used description for each available function. Microsoft decided to take macros out in Office 2008. They said users should write AppleScripts instead. I'll just say that AppleScript is a byzantine programming language. Microsoft decided to put macros back in Office 2011, but many old macros don't work or only work erratically. And the descriptions of the functions are often incomplete.
I'm sure many readers have their own tales of frustration about how software, computers, cars, and customer service departments work. So many of what we depend on may be produced efficiently, but do we get effective results using them?
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Memory and coincidence
Last Thursday I listened to a "To the Best of Our Knowledge" podcast from 2012-06-17. One of the segments was on the brain. It was rebroadcast of an interview with David Eagleman, author of "Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain". One of his points was how we push problems to our sub-conscious and an answer may just pop into our heads later, like after a good night's sleep.
I've often felt this, but one incident after the show really emphasized the truth of this.
I was trying to remember the name of a singer we hosted years ago when she gave a concert in Duluth. I could even picture one of her albums that we have. Nada!
Friday night we were on Skype with our son and he was talking about his July visit to Minnesota. He mentioned that he wanted to attend a concert of his friends, the duo Patchouli. Bingo! Claudia Schmidt! She's still performing.
I should reconnect our record player and run through an LP or two of hers.
I've often felt this, but one incident after the show really emphasized the truth of this.
I was trying to remember the name of a singer we hosted years ago when she gave a concert in Duluth. I could even picture one of her albums that we have. Nada!
Friday night we were on Skype with our son and he was talking about his July visit to Minnesota. He mentioned that he wanted to attend a concert of his friends, the duo Patchouli. Bingo! Claudia Schmidt! She's still performing.
I should reconnect our record player and run through an LP or two of hers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)