Why? Of the reporter’s “who, what, when, where, and why”, why seems too often used and too often not used enough.
“Why can’t I stay up?” “Why do I hafta eat…” are among the persistent questions of children.
“Why don’t they …” is one of the persistent questions of adults who absolve themselves of any responsibility for actions of governments and corporations.
And sometimes we can’t really do much about many activities except ask, “Why?” Here are a few of my annoying why’s.
Why do so many people complain about city workers standing around doing nothing but so few people complain about private contractors standing around doing nothing? I often see more of the latter than the former. In both cases they are generally doing one of three things. One, they have to wait for more trucks to arrive to deliver or take away things. Two, they have to discuss the next steps. Three, like all of us, they need a break.
Why do people in dark cars speed through parking garages without lights and ignore people who are backing out of spaces? Why do they think the backing drivers can see through the other parked cars? When I was a bus driver, one of the “yard rules” was that backing buses had right-of-way. There is no way that a driver backing a 30 or 40 foot vehicle could see through all the intervening buses. Think of the driver of a compact car trying to see through a pickup truck while backing out.
Why do people insist on talking on cell phones while driving? A few days ago I was walking across a parking lot and a driver was so busy on his cell phone that he didn’t even notice me. Had I said “Boo!” he might have swerved into a parked car.
Why do drivers turning left stay behind the crosswalk, but drivers turning right go over the crosswalk? The first may keep others from turning left on that light cycle. The second never look to their right for pedestrians.
Why do people have to have car stereos so loud that they can be heard a block or more away? I have been stopped alongside driver’s whose radios drowned out the sound from mine.
Why do sound systems have to be so loud that the words are distorted? I didn’t enjoy the excellent singing of “Les Misérables” because the distortions of the over-amped sound system garbled words.
Why do sound systems have to be so loud that they can be heard a mile or more away? Anybody with a car stereo that loud might get a ticket.
We can hear the Chester Bowl concerts over a half-mile away. Years ago we enjoyed concerts by Willowgreen and by the Downbeats within a few dozen feet of the stage. Then somebody decided to crank things up. The last time I tried to go to a Chester Bowl concert, I wouldn’t even enter the park. The sound was so loud that my ears hurt at the entrance on the Skyline Parkway.
The Bayfront concerts are even worse. I could understand some of the words of a recent performer while standing in front of Darland Hall at UMD! What’s that, about two miles away? I gave up going to Bayfront concerts years ago. I think the last time I went was when a friend was playing, and even his music was too loud.
Why do so few people show up to vote? Don’t they realize that by not voting they get us farther from a democracy and closer to an oligarchy? That is, “rule” of the people gives way to rule of the few. Even if your favorite candidates are not favored by the polls, if you show up at the polls, the “winners” will have a smaller margin of “victory”. There wouldn’t be so much talk of “landslides” if candidates won by 100,000 votes to 95,000 votes instead of 100,000 votes to 50,000 votes. Also remember polls can be very, very wrong. Jesse Ventura was predicted to come in third for governor, but enough people didn’t pay attention to the polls that he came in first.
Why do so many people complain about large corporations and then clammer to buy their products? I know, I know, we need large corporations for our cars, computers, and cell phones, but we can at least get our coffee at locally-owned coffee shops. I am amazed at the number of liberals who get their books at Amazon when they can get those same books at a locally-owned bookstore.
Why do so many people complain about government inefficiency and mistakes but ignore corporate inefficiency and mistakes? If corporations are so good why are there so many complaints on customer support blogs? Why are there warranties other than a revenue source? Why are there so many typos in books and newspapers?
Finally, why do so many writers keep writing columns to change the world? Far better writers than they have tried changing the world, but very few of them succeed. Even then, things still go badly again. Why?
Mel asks why is he getting older but not wiser.
Also published in Reader Weekly, 2014-08-07 at http://duluthreader.com/articles/2014/08/07/3861_why.
Showing posts with label traffic safety. Show all posts
Showing posts with label traffic safety. Show all posts
Thursday, August 07, 2014
Friday, July 17, 2009
"They" are out to get me
Several days ago, I pulled up to a stop sign and planned to turn right. I looked both ways, looking to my left last. Just as I started moving, a car coming fast from my right cut the corner right in front of me, driving over the near side of the crosswalk.
A couple days the later the same thing happened at another intersection. The driver was driving with one hand and holding a coffee cup in the other. She looked at me as if to say, "What are you doing in my lane?"
This past Monday I was crossing Lake Ave. on Superior St. with the pedestrian light in my favor. A car came roaring up to and over the cross walk just as I was in its path. I hollered, "Hey! This is a crosswalk!" I was tempted to walk over to the driver and point out that one stops at the heavy white line before the crosswalk, not in the middle of the crosswalk. But I didn't; I just kept going while my heart slowed down.
Are "they" after me? No, I think not. But there are too many drivers that think they are the only people in the world and their actions have no affect on others. You can see this in people that pull over the crosswalk when a bus or truck is obviously going to turn in their direction. You can see it in people who keep driving fast in a parking lot even when the driver of a backing vehicle can't see them. You can see it when people enter an intersection without checking even though a siren is wailing in the area.
Sometimes I wonder if we shouldn't require regular refresher driver training for people under 55.
A couple days the later the same thing happened at another intersection. The driver was driving with one hand and holding a coffee cup in the other. She looked at me as if to say, "What are you doing in my lane?"
This past Monday I was crossing Lake Ave. on Superior St. with the pedestrian light in my favor. A car came roaring up to and over the cross walk just as I was in its path. I hollered, "Hey! This is a crosswalk!" I was tempted to walk over to the driver and point out that one stops at the heavy white line before the crosswalk, not in the middle of the crosswalk. But I didn't; I just kept going while my heart slowed down.
Are "they" after me? No, I think not. But there are too many drivers that think they are the only people in the world and their actions have no affect on others. You can see this in people that pull over the crosswalk when a bus or truck is obviously going to turn in their direction. You can see it in people who keep driving fast in a parking lot even when the driver of a backing vehicle can't see them. You can see it when people enter an intersection without checking even though a siren is wailing in the area.
Sometimes I wonder if we shouldn't require regular refresher driver training for people under 55.
Saturday, January 19, 2008
Motorcycle helmets save more than lives
Many people believe that motorcycle riders shouldn't be required to wear helmets because they will only be hurting themselves. One of the latest to state this is Charles Wheelan, The Naked Economist, in "Street Smarts: Economists Take on Traffic Safety" posted on Yahoo Finance on Jan. 8, 2008.
He wrote that "motorcyclists are most likely to harm themselves" and "that helmets save lives doesn't necessarily justify laws that motorcyclists wear them." Unfortunately, the harm of a motorcycle accident isn't limited to the riders.
First, emergency responders have to come to the scene. The greater the severity of the accident, the more time they have to spend at the scene. This could mean that the responders would not be available for other emergencies. In the case of volunteer responders, they could be called from their beds in the middle of the night.
Second, any accident can cause traffic delays. The longer the responders are at the scene, the longer traffic is delayed. In many cases, this could mean less productivity for those making deliveries, an economic by-product, aka externality.
Third, the care of a severely traumatized rider costs money. This will be coming from insurance and taxes. The care for a preventable injury is also limiting the care for others.
If motorcycle riders are truly harming only themselves, should we let their injured bodies lie by the side of the road? I wouldn't want our society to be like that.
He wrote that "motorcyclists are most likely to harm themselves" and "that helmets save lives doesn't necessarily justify laws that motorcyclists wear them." Unfortunately, the harm of a motorcycle accident isn't limited to the riders.
First, emergency responders have to come to the scene. The greater the severity of the accident, the more time they have to spend at the scene. This could mean that the responders would not be available for other emergencies. In the case of volunteer responders, they could be called from their beds in the middle of the night.
Second, any accident can cause traffic delays. The longer the responders are at the scene, the longer traffic is delayed. In many cases, this could mean less productivity for those making deliveries, an economic by-product, aka externality.
Third, the care of a severely traumatized rider costs money. This will be coming from insurance and taxes. The care for a preventable injury is also limiting the care for others.
If motorcycle riders are truly harming only themselves, should we let their injured bodies lie by the side of the road? I wouldn't want our society to be like that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)