"When racists have the law behind them, they leave the law behind"
Comment left on "96 Year-Old Latino Former Arizona Governor Detained By Border Patrol In 100 Degree Heat" http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/07/06/511984/96-year-old-latino-former-arizona-governor-detained-by-border-patrol-in-100-degree-heat/, Ian Millhiser, Think Progress, 2012-07-06. Raul Héctor Castro was a governor of Arizona, a United States Ambassador, born in Mexico, and a United States Citizen. It wasn't the first time that he was harassed by the Border Patrol.
Showing posts with label medical. Show all posts
Showing posts with label medical. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Cutting health care costs, one economist's view
The "Naked Economist", Charles Wheelan, bared his soul and writings to the slings and arrows of his critics with "Here's how we can cut health care costs" published on Yahoo! Finance, 2010-01-11
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Real values from a real conservative
I enjoy reading David Brooks columns in the New York Times because he often makes sense out of all the conflicting ideas. He is conservative in the non-ideological sense; he doesn't take automatic positions because those are the currently popular "conservative" "values". He looks at ideas from several perspectives; he weighs the good and bad of proposals both now and on a longer time scale.
A good example is his column "The Values Question", New York Times, 2009-11-24.
The values in question are caring for the vulnerable in our society. If we care for the vulnerable, then we may not have resources to invest in other things we as a society want. On the other hand, do we want to live in a society that does not care for the vulnerable?
To me, this is real conservatism, even compassionate conservatism.
His apostasies from "true conservatism" include that to pay for the costs of some of these programs "the Democrats have admirably agreed to raise taxes."
A good example is his column "The Values Question", New York Times, 2009-11-24.
The values in question are caring for the vulnerable in our society. If we care for the vulnerable, then we may not have resources to invest in other things we as a society want. On the other hand, do we want to live in a society that does not care for the vulnerable?
To me, this is real conservatism, even compassionate conservatism.
His apostasies from "true conservatism" include that to pay for the costs of some of these programs "the Democrats have admirably agreed to raise taxes."
Labels:
conservative,
David Brooks,
Democrat,
health care,
hospitals,
insurance,
liberal,
medical,
New York Times,
Republican,
taxes,
values
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)