A few minutes ago my wife was driving on a through street when a car started across the intersection in front of us. I gave a loud YEOW envisioning us broadsiding the other car. My wife had applied the brakes and stopped before crossing the path of the other vehicle. That driver had also seen us and had stopped before crossing our path.
Thump! thump! go our hearts still.
But think about some of the other scenarios. Suppose the through-street driver had been on a cell phone. Would that driver have reacted in time? Suppose the cross-street driver had been on a cell phone. Would that driver have reacted in time? What if the through-street driver had been speeding? That driver would not have reacted in time, especially if that driver had been on a cell phone.
This is a good example of how much attention is needed to drive safely. A cell phone requires too much of that attention. Hang up and drive!
Showing posts with label texting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label texting. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Investment or tax
Clive Thompson argues that we should have more public transit to reduce the incidents of texting while driving: "Clive Thompson to Texters: Park the Car, Take the Bus". He decries the fact that in the U.S. we are so car-dependent that we increase the number of textures driving; in other countries young people don't even consider getting a car as soon as they are eligible because public transit is so convenient.
Can't you just hear the "no-taxers" screaming about the cost of better public transit? Of course, most of them drive on tax-supported roads. They never stop to think that more public transit might reduce their travel time. Of course, fewer cars on the road also means fewer accidents, which are a cost in themselves. Fewer texters on the road means even fewer accidents. And fewer accidents means fewer court cases, which means less taxes to pay for courts. And fewer accidents means more money in all of our pockets to spend elsewhere.
Many cities even find that it pays to have free bus service: Bozeman MT, Steamboat Springs CO, and Park City UT. Park City really wins the prize with every 10-minute service on its mainline from early in the morning until late at night. Park City parking is very limited; I wonder how much acreage and dollars would have been used if there had been no free bus service.
Can't you just hear the "no-taxers" screaming about the cost of better public transit? Of course, most of them drive on tax-supported roads. They never stop to think that more public transit might reduce their travel time. Of course, fewer cars on the road also means fewer accidents, which are a cost in themselves. Fewer texters on the road means even fewer accidents. And fewer accidents means fewer court cases, which means less taxes to pay for courts. And fewer accidents means more money in all of our pockets to spend elsewhere.
Many cities even find that it pays to have free bus service: Bozeman MT, Steamboat Springs CO, and Park City UT. Park City really wins the prize with every 10-minute service on its mainline from early in the morning until late at night. Park City parking is very limited; I wonder how much acreage and dollars would have been used if there had been no free bus service.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)