Showing posts with label World War I. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World War I. Show all posts

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Optimism in the Great War (1917-10-13)

My sister-in-law twice sent me a few letters that my mother's uncle, Myron F. Greed, sent to his brother and our grandfather, Arthur C. Greed.  I think she and my brother were given them by my grandfather or were found by them among his possessions after he died.  He was living in a retirement home near them in central Ohio.   I finally scanned both sets so that I can pass them on to other family members.

Myron F. Greed enlisted or was drafted into the U.S. Army in or before October 1917.  He was in the Sanitary Corps, a group that provided administrative and technical services to military physicians.  Myron spent most of his time in Camp McClellan, Anniston AL.

For the most part, his letters are upbeat and he seems to be enjoying camp life.

I will let his words speak for themselves.  I will only add commentary about people and places he mentions.


Note the postmark is Oct. 17, 1917, Myron wrote what looks like 1915 on his letter.  Note also the addresses of my grandfather on the various envelopes.  My grandfather moved a lot all of his life.


"Mother" is Eva Didham Greed Brainard; a widow, she had married for the second time that summer.


"The baby" is my mother, Martha Marie, born April 7.




Others in this series are:

Optimism in the Great War (1918-04-03)

Optimism in the Great War (1918 Spring)

Optimism in the Great War (Summer 1918)

Optimism in the Great War (1918-04-03)

 I don't know how many letters Myron wrote since October or if any of them are still around.





"Wife" is my grandfather's wife, Marie Schack Greed.  Yes, that is a German name.  She supposedly ran away from home because she didn't want to speak German.  I have some letters to her from a cousin who married a well-off man and lived on Long Island.  The cousin complains about some of the shortages.

"Gertrude" is Myron's and Arthur's sister.  I don't know if she had married yet.

"little Martha" is my mother.






"nigger" - sigh!  What would they think of how multi-hued his brother's descendants have become or may become?  And what would they think of their buddies in future wars?

Others in this series are:

Optimism in the Great War (1917-10-13)

Optimism in the Great War (1918 Spring)

Optimism in the Great War (Summer 1918)

Optimism in the Great War (Spring 1918)







"next Wed - the 11 or 12" - his "previous" letter was written on Wednesday, April 3.  He gives the day of the week for this letter as Tuesday with no day of the month.  I'll let you figure out the actual day he wrote this letter and whether this letter was before or after the letter of April 3.  It's too confusing to explain my own thoughts about this.









The names of the first group of people are not familiar to me, but A.C. Crocker was considered a cousin of my great-grandmother or great-grandfather.  His funeral was the first that I remember going to, probably in the late 1940s.  His longer name is Alfred C. Crocker.  He was born in England in 1896; his wife Minnie A Didham was born in Chagrin Falls in 1873.  She is either a niece of cousin of my great-grandmother.  Her given name may have been Mary, and her father was William Didham.


The name Fred Didham is not familiar to me, but he is probably a nephew of my great-grandmother.  He was born in Ohio in 1886 or 1887.




Martha was his niece who became my mother twenty years later.

Others in this series are:

Optimism in the Great War (1917-10-13)

Optimism in the Great War (1918-04-03)

Optimism in the Great War (Summer 1918)

Optimism in the Great War (Summer 1918)

This is the last in a series of letters that I am uploading.  Previous letters to follow in reverse order.

I have the following letters and cards from Myron F. Greed sent to his brother Arthur C. Greed in the summer of 1918.





 






Myron died October 6, 1918 in France, probably of flu.

Others in this series are:

Optimism in the Great War (1917-10-13)

Optimism in the Great War (1918-04-03)

Optimism in the Great War (1918 Spring)

Tuesday, September 03, 2013

Syria: Popular opinion vs. political opinion

The comments on New York Times articles about Obama's proposal tend to be against any military action with some support for military action.  Apparently popular opinion throughout the country is against any military action.  Apparently the political leadership in Congress seems to be for military action.

Fortunately, some congresspeople are not following the political crowd.  See "Following Classified Briefings, Nolan Will 'Vote and Work Against' U.S. Attack on Syria", Rep. Rick Nolan, 2013-09-03
http://nolan.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/following-classified-briefings-nolan-will-vote-and-work-against-us

I added my own little comment to "House Leaders Express Their Support for Syria Strike", Mark Landler, Michael R. Gordon, and Thom Shanker, New York Times, 2013-09-03:

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
"[O]nly the dead have seen the end of war."
– George Santayana

No matter what your opinion, be sure to send email to the President, your Representative, and both of your Senators.  They might not read your email, but rest assured their staffs are putting them in pro and con "piles".

Oh, yeah!  Remember that little incident in Sarajevo?  How many millions died because of all the miscalculations?

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Quote of the day - Anti-war stance

"The antiwar cause has always been better served by brave dissenters like La Follette than by political chameleons like Kellogg."

"Frank Kellogg: Before peace prize he was a hawk", Oliver Steinberg, Letter to the Star Tribune, 2013-08-28

Wednesday, March 07, 2012

Iran - Questions for American hawks

First, a little history.  In 1914 the Archduke Frantz Ferdinand of Austria was assassinated in Sarajevo, Serbia.  The Austrian government gave an ultimatum to Serbia, of which Serbia agreed to most terms except allowing Austrian police to participate in the investigation of the assassination.  Rather than negotiate, Austria attacked Serbia.  The consequences were as bad as all the participants believed they would be and worse.  We are still living with those consequences nearly a century later.

Now many demands are being made of Iran concerning its nuclear ambitions.  Many in the U.S. and Israel are ready to go to war against Iran if those demands aren't met.  Have these hawks considered ALL the possible effects of such a war?

Let's ask some "trivial" questions first.

Many of these hawks want low taxes.  If taxes are low and kept low, where is the money to come from to wage a new war?

Many of these hawks want low oil prices.  If Iran is attacked, what will happen to oil prices?

Many of these hawks want to protect the unborn.  If Iran is attacked, how many unborn children will die?  Do you really think only soldiers will die in any modern war?

Now let's look at some more global issues.

If Saudi Arabia feels threatened by Iranian nuclear ambitions, shouldn't Saudi Arabia be the country to act?  After all, the U.S. has sold them many, many advanced military aircraft.  Shouldn't Saudi pilots be able to operate these aircraft efficiently and effectively?  If not, why sell the aircraft to Saudi Arabia in the first place?

If the U.S. attacks Iran, this will be the third Muslim country the U.S. has invaded in a generation.  What will be the reaction be of many Muslims throughout the world?  Will there be a rush of Mujahideen to Iran?  What side will various Muslim governments take?

Will a U.S. attack on Iran bring about the fall of many pro-U.S. Muslim governments.  If so, which side will the new governments take?  If the government of an oil-producing nation falls, will the new government continue or cease oil deliveries to the U.S. or to European countries?

What will the reaction of Pakistan be to an attack on Iran?  Will the current generals do nothing?  Will they be replaced in a coup by more hawkish officers?  Officers who will be quite willing to aim nuclear weapons at U.S. forces or even U.S. territory?

There are more Muslims living in India than in Pakistan.  Would Indian Muslims stage a coup and join in resisting a U.S. attack on Iran?  India also has nuclear weapons.

What side will Russia and China take?

If Iran is attacked, what will North Korea's reaction be?  It has been unpredictable and is not known for acting in its long-term interests.

I think it is safe to say that if the U.S. (or Israel) attacks Iran, many people will die who have nothing to do with the current Iranian government or its nuclear programs.  Also, I think it is safe to say that the negative repercussions of an attack will last for at least two generations and maybe even a century.

Meanwhile, for over two generations the U.S. has called the largest offensive military force in the world "defense".  At the same time. those who have been the biggest proponents of the military have done their best to sabotage a true defense - energy independence.  They have opposed many efforts for alternative fuels and for greater energy efficiency.

"When will they ever learn?"  "The answer is blowin' in the wind."  They didn't.